RESUMO
BACKGROUND: In the last years, limited studies have described that radiotherapy could produce important distant responses in unirradiated sites, the so-called "abscopal effect". Recent evidence suggests that radiotherapy induces antigen release from tumor, in this way activating the immune system. However, radiotherapy alone is rarely enough to induce the systemic response requested for control of the metastases. With the advent of immunotherapy, the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have demonstrated impressive efficacy in various metastatic cancers. Currently, preclinical and clinical studies have reported a significant increase of abscopal responses in patients treated with the combination of radiotherapy and ICI. The purpose of this review was summarizing the clinical studies combining radiotherapy and ipilimumab (ipi), particularly focusing on abscopal responses. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Databases of Medline (via Pubmed) from 2009 to June 2, 2017 were reviewed to obtain English language studies reporting clinical abscopal effect in the combination of radiotherapy with exclusive ipi in metastatic melanoma cancers. Included studies reported the abscopal effect as a primary endpoint, and as secondary endpoint included overall survival and toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies included a total of 451 patients, and in 5/16 studies the patients were treated on research protocols and followed-up prospectively. The median reported abscopal effect and OS were 26.5% and 19 months, respectively. The median toxicity ≥ Grade 3 was 18.3% ranged from 10% to 20%. CONCLUSION: Early clinical outcomes reports suggest that the combination of ipilimumab and RT may improve survival in metastatic melanoma patients. The abscopal responses become a clinically relevant effect of such combination and should be studied in controlled randomized trials.
RESUMO
Objetivo. La intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT, «radioterapia intraoperatoria») en pacientes seleccionadas con cáncer de mama permite un tratamiento corto y preciso durante la cirugía conservadora sobre el lecho tumoral in situ. Presentamos nuestra experiencia inicial de IORT con dispositivo Intrabeam®. Pacientes y métodos. Se seleccionaron inicialmente 120 pacientes con cáncer de mama para IORT con Intrabeam® según protocolo TARGIT-A, desde enero de 2013 hasta febrero de 2015. Las indicaciones fueron: candidatas a cirugía conservadora, mayores de 45 años, diagnóstico histológico de carcinoma ductal infiltrante≤3cm hormonodependiente y axila clínica, ecográfica e histológicamente negativa. Resultados. De las pacientes seleccionadas, 34 (28%) no recibieron IORT debido al tamaño de la cavidad quirúrgica (28 casos) o problemas técnicos (6 casos). Finalmente, 86 pacientes (72%) recibieron IORT. La edad media fue de 64 años (DE±8,4). En 22 pacientes (26%) fue preciso administrar radioterapia externa a toda la mama. Trece pacientes (15%) tuvieron complicaciones: 3 casos de seroma que precisaron de más de 3 punciones para resolución (4%), 6 casos de absceso-mastitis (7%), 2 casos de hematoma (2%) y 2 casos de dehiscencia parcial de la herida quirúrgica (2%). No hubo toxicidad grave (grado iii-iv). El resultado estético fue bueno o muy bueno en el 87% de las pacientes (75). Conclusión. La IORT con Intrabeam® es una alternativa segura y bien tolerada frente a la radioterapia externa en pacientes seleccionadas, con un buen resultado estético a corto plazo (AU)
Objective. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) in selected patients with breast cancer allows a short and precise treatment on the tumor bed in situ during conservative surgery. We present our initial experience of IORT with the Intrabeam® device. Patients and methods. From January 2013 to February 2015, 120 patients with breast cancer were pre-selected for IORT with Intrabeam® according to the TARGIT-A protocol. The indications were as follows: candidates for conservative surgery, age older than 45 years, a histological diagnosis of hormone-dependent infiltrating ductal carcinoma≤3cm and absence of axillary involvement on physical, ultrasound and histological examination. Results. Among the selected patients, 34 (28%) did not receive IORT due to the size of the surgical cavity (28 patients) or technical problems (6 patients). Finally, 86 patients (72%) received IORT. The average age was 64 years (SD±8.4). In 22 patients (26%), it was necessary to administer external beam radiotherapy to the whole breast. Thirteen patients (15%) had complications: 3 cases of seroma requiring more than 3 attempts for resolution (4%), 6 cases of abscess-mastitis (7%), 2 cases of hematoma (2%) and 2 cases of partial dehiscence of the surgical wound (2%). There was no severe toxicity (grade iii-iv). The aesthetic result was good or very good in 87% of the patients (n=75). Conclusion. IORT with Intrabeam® is a safe and well tolerated alternative versus external radiotherapy in selected patients and provides a good short-term aesthetic result (AU)
